By Samuel Strait – Reporter at Large – March 4, 2022 – Picture Credit to wildsalmoncenter.org One would think that the Yurok tribe had Christmas come early, or late depending on how you look at it. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has released a draft impact statement for examination regarding the removal of four dams on the lower Klamath River. This is a prelude to the final version scheduled to be released in September 2022, along with the surrender of the licensing for the Dams. According to the Klamath River Renewal Corporation, (KRRC) this will allow the company to begin the "Great Drain" of the reservoirs behind each of the four dams slated for January of 2024. Now that the FERC has acted, the KRRC is in a great rush to get the project moving, barring any legal maneuvering to halt the project, and be on to the renewal part. The FERC is currently accepting public comment through April 18th. This is the part that makes this story interesting. The dam removal according to the impact statement "is expected to improve water quality and temperature conditions on the Klamath River and allow declining fish populations to recover". While the statement claims to have come to this conclusion based on information provided by the Yurok Tribe, the Karuk Tribe, American Trout Unlimited, Institute for Fisheries Resources, and other groups, much of that "information" is largely regurgitated data from the original Department of the Interior study early on. This data and the accompanying conclusions was roundly panned as biased and inaccurate. Ooops, looks like the FERC is depending on information that may not coincide with any of the projected out comes. While it is likely this project will blunder forward at a current estimate of $434 million of a budgeted $450 million, we can almost be assured of between $50 and $90 million in cost over runs. The current budget is funded by $200 million from PacifiCorp surcharges on its customers, and $250 million is coming from a California water bond. A water bond that was supposed to increase water supplies in California not decrease them. Funny how that works when the Democrats in Sacramento and Environazis get together. Never fear, it will accomplish None of the goals set out and is likely to actually reduce the returns of fish on the river. This project is ill conceived from the start, as the removal of the four dams will mean the elimination of two hatcheries responsible for a bit over 20% of the current returns to the river. Following that, the river will likely not support any fishery for a three to five year period following the release of the stored water. The Yurok and Karuk don't care because they plan on being subsidized during that period by the government with taxpayer dollars. And finally all parties in favor of dam removal will be roundly disappointed when very little if any recovery of fish stocks occur until the actual problem is solved. And it has nothing to do with the four dams slated to be removed. Anybody who is actually paying attention to the returns over the last three or four decades will have noticed a sharp decline in returning fish. The dams have been in place for in two cases 100 years. The substantial decline in fish stocks began to occur years after the dams were operational and for nearly sixty years no noticeable decline in returning salmon was evidenced. Dams… Fish population decline… not likely. And on to the "white elephant" in the room. After the Second World War, populations of Countries on the eastern side of Asia began to explode to well over one and a half billion people live in China alone. Over 30% of the world's population lives in Countries that border that side of the Pacific Ocean. Food has become a problem and the Communists in China are not too picky about where it comes from. A major source of protein comes from the Ocean for most of these Countries and they have exploited the Pacific Ocean and its fish stocks since then. Studies have shown that nearly all fish populations in that Ocean have been reduced to any where from between 1% to 3% of their 1970's populations. The fish thought to be returning to West Coast rivers and streams are among those populations that have been reduced. Other rivers and streams have had similar dam removal projects go forward, none on the scale of this one, with NO evidence that fish populations have recovered inspite of in some cases over a decade of time has passed. The tribes and enviros have been sold a bill of goods that does no one any favors, except to fatten the wallets of those that are operating the KRRC. Be prepared for a dismal future in the river until the real problem is fixed… if that is even possible. Likely the cost over runs will prevent few, if any habitat restoration, and the taxpayer in California will be on the hook for even more money. PacifiCorp, Warren Buffet, the KRRC, and all the sub contractors will be walking away, pockets stuffed with cash and all the government propaganda will never be called out. Guess the tribes can add one more grievance to the growing list….