Crescent City Times

PART TWO: Our Airport

C
Crescent City Times
January 20, 2021 at 05:11 AM
6 years ago
By Samuel Strait, Report at Large – January 20, 2021 The following is the second…
By Samuel Strait, Report at Large – January 20, 2021 The following is the second part of a two part series on the Del Norte County Regional Airport. To recap, we now have a new underutilized terminal that will require a stable commercial airline in order to pay down the debt from construction of the terminal. We are currently serviced by Contour Airlines with one thirty passenger flight per day to Oakland, California. The maximum enplanements for Contour would be 10,950 per year. Thus far they achieved 5,907 in nine months of operation in 2018 and 9,144 in the entire year of 2019. If these numbers continue, it begs the question why a new terminal was given priority. There is no data for 2020, but expect a sharp decrease due to Covid-19 restrictions. Contour Airlines has recently been renewed on an AEAS contract for four years thru October 31, 2024. Contour has in the past year suspended service in eight of their current markets. The terminal itself, a total of nearly $20,000,000 in construction and development costs , is expected to pay that debt with a service fee paid by commercial air passengers. No commercial passengers, no money to pay the debt, so hopefully Contour Air will stay in service for a very long time. As I stated in part one, the one route it services is to Oakland, California at fares between $90 and $179, which is very reasonable if you do not factor in a subsidy of $336 per seat occupied or unoccupied. What that means is that if Contour Air were to offer it's services to Oakland as a normal non subsidized airline, the fare to Oakland would be somewhere in the neighborhood of $500 to $700 per seat. Fortunately that is not the case. What is troubling in spite of the recent contract signing, Contour Air has experienced difficulties maintaining its routes in unprofitable locations, three in California and one in Nevada in the past year. It continues to have a limited capacity for growth in this market, something that is essential for the airport to move towards a longer runway. More importantly Contour Airlines does not appear to be interested in moving from Oakland citing cost. For an airline that touts it customer service, this seems to be an odd stance. Once the new terminal was completed and Contour Air was installed until 2024, the BCRAA seems to have lost the imperative of a longer runway, better service to a larger market and a non stop to Sacramento. Much of this hesitancy can be laid at the feet of the uncertain future of air travel itself. If it were to press forward for the longer runway and was successful, the Airport Authority would have a better chance of attracting service from a broader array of airlines, one of which would offer the destinations most useful for growth at the airport and in the county as well. The current situation is only marginally acceptable providing Contour Airlines is able to continue service. As long as the Authority continues to sit on its hands nothing further will develop.

Community Discussion

Join the conversation about this article.

This discussion is about the full content. Please respect the original source and use this for educational discussion only.

Please log in to start or join discussions.

Article Details

Published January 20, 2021 at 05:11 AM
Reading Time 0 min
Category general