Opinion Piece By Samuel Strait – September 17, 2018 – For all of the local folks that have been deceived by the editorial penned by our illustrious editor of the Triplicate, Robin Fornoff, last month claiming a new, more enlightened less restrictive approach to his editorial style surrounding future submissions to "Letters to the Editor" or "Coastal Voices" be prepared to be disappointed very quickly. As they say, " a leopard doesn't change his spots" no matter how much pressure he comes under. In spite of the precipitous drop off of participation to the opinion page over the last couple of years in the Triplicate to almost zero in the way of local Letters on the opinion page and a new editor, Kim Fowler, apparently editor Fornoff hasn't received the "Memo", if there ever was one. The plea for participation will only work if you actually mean it and more importantly follow through. While there have been a spate of recent Letters, and Coastal Voices appearing in the Triplicate, most likely due to the decline of circulation numbers, don't expect it to continue unless you have the "proper" political perspective. Similarly, if you have been banned in the past, don't expect to have your sentence commuted any time soon. Editor Fornoff has not changed the way he does business. He still limits Letters to 300 words or less, even when he has naught but the likes of John Alexander, John Wood, Will Meriwether locally or some progressive columnist from out of the area entirely to fill the space. He continues to limit local contributions to one per thirty days. And he has a rather convoluted way of determining what is acceptable in the first place, unless it conforms to his particular view of the world. While superficially he appears to be more even handed when it comes to the actual "News" presented in the Triplicate of late, at least with regard to an attempt to be more objective, do not be at all surprised if it does not continue. There is already a noticeable erosion as we have come further from his August Mea Culpa. While time will tell, I fully expect the Editor to return to his previous style very shortly, if he hasn't already. Below you will find a letter sent to Robin Fornoff on the 25th of August this year, responding to his editorial "New simpler guidelines for opinion submissions – Tell us what you think" which appeared in the August 16th version of the Triplicate. > cc: K. Fowler > > While it is not necessary to publish this as part of this Letter, I > think that the 300 word limit is and always will be a travesty. After > all you aren't limited to 300 words when you write a letter to your > mother, and it is nearly impossible to correct the 1500-2000 word > narratives that routinely appear in the Triplicate as objective news > when you only have 300 words. Just an observation. It has now been 21 days since Editor Fornoff received the above letter and it has yet to appear on the editorial page of the Triplicate in any form. No acknowledgement of receipt, or request to edit. Nothing. Not what one would expect from an Editor that has had several issues published without a single Letter to the Editor. Not what one would expect from a truly professional newspaper editor no matter how much he hated the content. Now you can say what you will about this kind of behavior, but it is fully in-line with how Robin Fornoff has conducted business at the Triplicate since day one. Being one of those that was banned early on, this kind of juvenile behavior does not surprise me in the least from the editor of the Triplicate and I fully expect him to return to his previous incarnation sooner rather than later. Perhaps starting a subscription to the Triplicate or renewing an old one on the basis of his August 16th editorial is a bit premature. Mr. Fornoff seems bent on dooming the Triplicate to obscurity. Hope that Western Communications can weather the decline until Mr. Fornoff is off to an even smaller print paper.