Crescent City Times

WHY WON'T CITY DISCUSS 11.8% EXPANSION?

C
Crescent City Times
March 27, 2013 at 11:40 AM
14 years ago
BY DONNA WESTFALL In follow up to the series on public records requests and the…
BY DONNA WESTFALL In follow up to the series on public records requests and the on-going questions concerning the expansion component on the waste water treatment plant, today I received in the mail a letter from City Manager, Gene Palazzo. He states, "In a previous letter, Mr. Black explained that there are no 'reports' by the three engineering firms. Over the years, City staff has spent a number hours with you, Mr. Nunn, and others discussing and reviewing the 11.8% expansion figure. As City Manager, I am declining Mr. Wier's time to engage in another meeting to discuss this topic." Being that I have met with Gene, Eric Wier and Wes Nunn once last year for 1 hour with unsatisfactory results, I think Mr. Palazzo is avoiding the issue. What do you think? This concerns records request #2. I have not gotten an answer on WHO prepared the 1 page document and where did it come from? WHY is there a discrepancy between $12 million on MBR vs $30 million on the Wahlund bid? WHO came up with 17% future %? Did people lie on the Petition for Writ of Mandate when they (Brown & Caldwell, Kennedy/Jenks and Stover Engineering) developed the 11% expansion rate? Am I missing something? Until they can prove to me how they came up with 11.55% or 11.8% I am submitting my sewer bill payments UNDER PROTEST. I think the city is in violation of Prop 218. I do not intend to pay for expansion when ratepayers are only supposed to pay for operations and maintenance. Again, this is the 1 page I received from the city.

Community Discussion

Join the conversation about this article.

This discussion is about the full content. Please respect the original source and use this for educational discussion only.

Please log in to start or join discussions.

Article Details

Published March 27, 2013 at 11:40 AM
Reading Time 0 min
Category general